Ok, thankyou :)

Now, I will compile my own kernel :D

On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Alec T. Habig <[log in to unmask]>wrote:

> Fernando Andr?s Mu?oz Bravo writes:
> > My question is: What kernel can I use, or is "better": Oficial from RHEL
> > sources and SL, or sources from kernel.org? I would like to read your
> > advices :)
>
> Starting from the SL kernel srpms will:
>
>  a) ensure that all the tweaks to the kernel which all the other parts
>    of your system are expecting are still there, thus break less stuff;
>
>  b) Let you work in the rpm build environment, making things easier to
>    keep track of in the same way as the rest of the system is built and
>    hop back to standard kernels for debugging more easily.
>
> That said, wouldn't surprise me if you could find a CentOS kernel
> already compiled with XFS support (I want to say look for the
> "centos-plus" series of kernels, but that's probably way outdated
> information).  Then you could just install their binary rpm and not
> worry about the compilation game.
>
> --
>            Alec Habig, University of Minnesota Duluth Physics Dept.
>                            [log in to unmask]
>                       http://neutrino.d.umn.edu/~habig/
>



-- 
Fernando Andrés Muñoz Bravo
*Tg.* Análisis y Desarollo de Sistemas de Información
I*M: [log in to unmask]*

http://blogdrake.net/blog/waspper/
http://waspper.deviantart.com/
http://artdriva.deviantart.com/

Linux user #487547