Ok, thankyou :) Now, I will compile my own kernel :D On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Alec T. Habig <[log in to unmask]>wrote: > Fernando Andr?s Mu?oz Bravo writes: > > My question is: What kernel can I use, or is "better": Oficial from RHEL > > sources and SL, or sources from kernel.org? I would like to read your > > advices :) > > Starting from the SL kernel srpms will: > > a) ensure that all the tweaks to the kernel which all the other parts > of your system are expecting are still there, thus break less stuff; > > b) Let you work in the rpm build environment, making things easier to > keep track of in the same way as the rest of the system is built and > hop back to standard kernels for debugging more easily. > > That said, wouldn't surprise me if you could find a CentOS kernel > already compiled with XFS support (I want to say look for the > "centos-plus" series of kernels, but that's probably way outdated > information). Then you could just install their binary rpm and not > worry about the compilation game. > > -- > Alec Habig, University of Minnesota Duluth Physics Dept. > [log in to unmask] > http://neutrino.d.umn.edu/~habig/ > -- Fernando Andrés Muñoz Bravo *Tg.* Análisis y Desarollo de Sistemas de Información I*M: [log in to unmask]* http://blogdrake.net/blog/waspper/ http://waspper.deviantart.com/ http://artdriva.deviantart.com/ Linux user #487547