On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 9:11 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> git repositories *can* be as easy to use as SRPM's, *if* they are
> tagged, and *if* there is a way to obtain an index of the relevant
> tags of a particular point release. So the risk isn't in using git:
> it's in the lack, so far, of relevant tags to distinguish RHEL source
> code from whatever CentOS may choose to modify, and the potential for
> unknown changes between the RHEL internal git repositories and
> whatever CentOS may choose to integrate and publish.

I would expect TUV (Red Hat) sources to be on one branch and all
CentOS modifications on a different branch.

This seems a minimal requirement for sanity. Are you saying this is
not what they are doing?

 - Pat