SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

June 2014

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Steve Traylen <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Steve Traylen <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 6 Jun 2014 16:41:57 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (49 lines)
Excerpts from Pat Riehecky's message of 2014-06-06 16:20:35 +0200:
> The folks over at CentOS are planning to host the RHEL source in a set 
> of git repos.  The long term future of source rpms on ftp.redhat.com is 
> somewhat fluid right now.


https://indico.cern.ch/event/274555/session/11/#20140519

has some SL related presentations from last week.

Steve

> 
> Pat
> 
> On 06/06/2014 09:14 AM, Peter C. Chiu wrote:
> > An indirect news from a colleague, hence I am seeking for more creditable clarification from this group.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Stephen Berg (Contractor) [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> > Sent: 06 June 2014 15:11
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: Re: News on Scientific Linux
> >
> > On 06/06/2014 09:08 AM, [log in to unmask] wrote:
> >> I have heard of some rather upsetting news that "Scientific Linux will
> >> likely to be dropped soon as RHEL aren't planning to release source rpms outside the RHEL customers - only source tar balls".
> >>
> >> Not sure if the change on source makes any difference to the Sc Linux development team.
> >>
> >> But I shall be grateful if someone please confirm or deny this news.
> >>
> >> Many thanks.
> >>
> >> Peter
> > What's your source for that information?
> >
> > --
> > Stephen Berg
> > Systems Administrator
> > NRL Code: 7320
> > Office: 228-688-5738
> > [log in to unmask]
> 

-- 
-- 
Steve Traylen, CERN IT.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2