SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

June 2014

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Zhi-Wei Lu <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Zhi-Wei Lu <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 24 Jun 2014 12:18:04 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
I had similar problem before, someone changed the stock system libz.so with a newer version libz.so, which yum didn't like it!

Zhi-Wei Lu
IET-CR-Network Operations Center
University of California, Davis
(530) 752-0155

-----Original Message-----
From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Werf, C.G. van der (Carel)
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 12:23 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: yum segfaulting

Hi,

I have two identical SL 5.3 fileservers, who function as a DRBD-pair.   
One of them was recently completely replaced with identical hardware, so I had to image the old one, and install OS-image on "new" server.

But now, when I run yum on the new server, it returns a segmentation fault (even a simple: # yum --help).

Googling this, a lot of pages hint for a memory error. But, running a memtest did not show any error.

So far, only yum returns the segmentation fault.

Does anyone have any clue for this ?

Regards,
Carel van der Werf

ATOM RSS1 RSS2