Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 4 Jun 2014 17:21:26 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
We currently run SL 6 on our compute engine. It is multinode,
internally connected by an Infiniband QDR 12x compute fabric (with plans
to go to EDR 12X before NDR becomes production) and an 802.3ae (10
Gbit/s) control fabric, using X86-64 CPUs and Nvidia Tesla GPUs at each
node currently under Nvidia CUDA 6. We are considering incorporating
Intel Xeon Phi units to supplement and/or replace the GPUs.
We are (somewhat) familiar with CUDA and GPU issues, and the problems
associated with porting/programming/designing applications for CUDA.
Supposedly the Xeon Phi eliminates much of the syntactical complexity of
a CUDA application, in so far as any multithreaded parallel (concurrent)
application can be simplified but still exceed that of a simple
uniprocessor software design.
Does anyone have any experience with the Xeon Phi in real production
research environments as either a development or porting platform,
particularly in comparison with real experience on the Nvidia Tesla GPU
CUDA platform and environment, under SL 6? How much support is there
for the Intel Xeon Phi under SL? Correspondence off-list is fine.
Yasha Karant
|
|
|