Mark Stodola wrote:
> Edward Dowllar wrote:
>> I do really like the designs that include the spinning electrons. But, there is something about Entry 1 that is very appealing for its use as a logo. Perhaps its appeal is its simplicity in design and potential broader use. Scientific pursuits encompass a wide variety of disciplines and some might interpret its use is only for physics. That's just my 2 cents. Keep up the good work. 
>>
>> Edward
>>   
> I agree.  Pulling on my small knowledge of graphic design, a good logo 
> should be easily recognizable when printed in grayscale, b&w, and 
> usually a 2 color palette.  I personally would lean toward the 1st entry 
> because of that.  I think it could work better in cases of icons, 
> letterhead, case badges, etc.  KISS.
> 
> On the flip side, it would be a major imaging change for SL from a 
> recognition standpoint.
> 
> -Mark
> 

I agree as well. I think the nucleus design is getting a bit old and 
from a design standpoint, it's recognizable, but tired and way too busy.

I will attempt to put my money where my mouth is, so to speak, by 
submitting a couple of designs myself :)

-Chris