Mark Stodola wrote: > Edward Dowllar wrote: >> I do really like the designs that include the spinning electrons. But, there is something about Entry 1 that is very appealing for its use as a logo. Perhaps its appeal is its simplicity in design and potential broader use. Scientific pursuits encompass a wide variety of disciplines and some might interpret its use is only for physics. That's just my 2 cents. Keep up the good work. >> >> Edward >> > I agree. Pulling on my small knowledge of graphic design, a good logo > should be easily recognizable when printed in grayscale, b&w, and > usually a 2 color palette. I personally would lean toward the 1st entry > because of that. I think it could work better in cases of icons, > letterhead, case badges, etc. KISS. > > On the flip side, it would be a major imaging change for SL from a > recognition standpoint. > > -Mark > I agree as well. I think the nucleus design is getting a bit old and from a design standpoint, it's recognizable, but tired and way too busy. I will attempt to put my money where my mouth is, so to speak, by submitting a couple of designs myself :) -Chris