Sender: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:31:09 -0700 |
MIME-version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-type: |
text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-transfer-encoding: |
7BIT |
Comments: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Mark Stodola wrote:
> Edward Dowllar wrote:
>> I do really like the designs that include the spinning electrons. But, there is something about Entry 1 that is very appealing for its use as a logo. Perhaps its appeal is its simplicity in design and potential broader use. Scientific pursuits encompass a wide variety of disciplines and some might interpret its use is only for physics. That's just my 2 cents. Keep up the good work.
>>
>> Edward
>>
> I agree. Pulling on my small knowledge of graphic design, a good logo
> should be easily recognizable when printed in grayscale, b&w, and
> usually a 2 color palette. I personally would lean toward the 1st entry
> because of that. I think it could work better in cases of icons,
> letterhead, case badges, etc. KISS.
>
> On the flip side, it would be a major imaging change for SL from a
> recognition standpoint.
>
> -Mark
>
I agree as well. I think the nucleus design is getting a bit old and
from a design standpoint, it's recognizable, but tired and way too busy.
I will attempt to put my money where my mouth is, so to speak, by
submitting a couple of designs myself :)
-Chris
|
|
|