Désolé, j'ai lu trop vite...!!!

Il faut absolument qu'on mette en place un minimum de bascule automatique 
du BDII... On en reparlera.

Michel

--On jeudi 7 juin 2007 06:55 -0700 Radu-Cristian FOTESCU 
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>> https://www.scientificlinux.org/documentation/faq/distro.versions
>
>
>
> Thank you!
>
>
>
>> One thing to note is that CentOS doesn't have what we call a "rolling"
>> area,
>
>> which is our "beta" area in CentOS terms.  They have their beta
>> (rolling) area
>
>> on a completely different server so it doesn't get mixed up.
>
>
>
>
> Err...
> I suppose things are even more complicated:
> 1. IMHO, "rolling" means "you don't have to change anything to upgrade",
> so by my dictionary, both SL's "4x" and CentOS' "4" are "rolling", as
> they map to the latest "4.5" etc. 2. Maybe CentOS' "FastTrack" repository
> is something like SL's "rolling"?! Aren't both of them something
> "available before it's really available"? 3. "Beta" is really beta... and
> nobody wants to run such stuff...
>
> Thank you one more time,
> R-C
>
>
>
>
>
>       Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at giving junk
> email the boot with the All-new Yahoo! Mail at
> http://mrd.mail.yahoo.com/try_beta?.intl=ca



     *************************************************************
     * Michel Jouvin                 Email : [log in to unmask] *
     * LAL / CNRS                    Tel : +33 1 64468932        *
     * B.P. 34                       Fax : +33 1 69079404        *
     * 91898 Orsay Cedex                                         *
     * France                                                    *
     *************************************************************