Désolé, j'ai lu trop vite...!!! Il faut absolument qu'on mette en place un minimum de bascule automatique du BDII... On en reparlera. Michel --On jeudi 7 juin 2007 06:55 -0700 Radu-Cristian FOTESCU <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> https://www.scientificlinux.org/documentation/faq/distro.versions > > > > Thank you! > > > >> One thing to note is that CentOS doesn't have what we call a "rolling" >> area, > >> which is our "beta" area in CentOS terms. They have their beta >> (rolling) area > >> on a completely different server so it doesn't get mixed up. > > > > > Err... > I suppose things are even more complicated: > 1. IMHO, "rolling" means "you don't have to change anything to upgrade", > so by my dictionary, both SL's "4x" and CentOS' "4" are "rolling", as > they map to the latest "4.5" etc. 2. Maybe CentOS' "FastTrack" repository > is something like SL's "rolling"?! Aren't both of them something > "available before it's really available"? 3. "Beta" is really beta... and > nobody wants to run such stuff... > > Thank you one more time, > R-C > > > > > > Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at giving junk > email the boot with the All-new Yahoo! Mail at > http://mrd.mail.yahoo.com/try_beta?.intl=ca ************************************************************* * Michel Jouvin Email : [log in to unmask] * * LAL / CNRS Tel : +33 1 64468932 * * B.P. 34 Fax : +33 1 69079404 * * 91898 Orsay Cedex * * France * *************************************************************