Sender: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 7 Jun 2007 16:00:51 +0200 |
MIME-version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-type: |
text/plain; format=flowed; charset=utf-8 |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-disposition: |
inline |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-transfer-encoding: |
QUOTED-PRINTABLE |
Comments: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Désolé, j'ai lu trop vite...!!!
Il faut absolument qu'on mette en place un minimum de bascule automatique
du BDII... On en reparlera.
Michel
--On jeudi 7 juin 2007 06:55 -0700 Radu-Cristian FOTESCU
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> https://www.scientificlinux.org/documentation/faq/distro.versions
>
>
>
> Thank you!
>
>
>
>> One thing to note is that CentOS doesn't have what we call a "rolling"
>> area,
>
>> which is our "beta" area in CentOS terms. They have their beta
>> (rolling) area
>
>> on a completely different server so it doesn't get mixed up.
>
>
>
>
> Err...
> I suppose things are even more complicated:
> 1. IMHO, "rolling" means "you don't have to change anything to upgrade",
> so by my dictionary, both SL's "4x" and CentOS' "4" are "rolling", as
> they map to the latest "4.5" etc. 2. Maybe CentOS' "FastTrack" repository
> is something like SL's "rolling"?! Aren't both of them something
> "available before it's really available"? 3. "Beta" is really beta... and
> nobody wants to run such stuff...
>
> Thank you one more time,
> R-C
>
>
>
>
>
> Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at giving junk
> email the boot with the All-new Yahoo! Mail at
> http://mrd.mail.yahoo.com/try_beta?.intl=ca
*************************************************************
* Michel Jouvin Email : [log in to unmask] *
* LAL / CNRS Tel : +33 1 64468932 *
* B.P. 34 Fax : +33 1 69079404 *
* 91898 Orsay Cedex *
* France *
*************************************************************
|
|
|