Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>> Everyone hasn't *moved* to including the yum configuration in the main
>> release package, it's always been that way. And we've always pulled it
>> out. It's been that way since yum 1.0.
>
> Sorry people talking past each other alert :)
>
> What Karanbir is talking about is in the redhat-release, or
> centos-release package. When you go to the dell, dag, etc
> repositories, you get a dell-release, dag-release, livna-release etc
> that contains the /etc/livna-release file and the stuff to stick in
> /etc/yum.repos.d/ directory.
>
> I hope that is a bit clearer.
>
Thanks for clearing that up, I was a bit confused about Troy's reply :)
--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219@icq