|
|
|
|
Size
|
Re: Desktop configuration management (Was: Future of Scientific Linux)
|
Michel Jouvin |
Wed, 7 Mar 2007 07:49:38 +0100 |
68 lines |
Re: directory structures - SL5 updates, contrib, etc...
|
Troy Dawson |
Wed, 14 Mar 2007 08:27:50 -0500 |
90 lines |
Re: directory structures - SL5 updates, contrib, etc...
|
Alex Owen |
Wed, 14 Mar 2007 14:10:15 +0000 |
52 lines |
Re: directory structures - SL5 updates, contrib, etc...
|
Marc W. Mengel |
Wed, 14 Mar 2007 09:12:43 -0500 |
34 lines |
Re: directory structures - SL5 updates, contrib, etc...
|
Troy Dawson |
Wed, 14 Mar 2007 09:27:34 -0500 |
46 lines |
Re: directory structures - SL5 updates, contrib, etc...
|
Owen Synge |
Wed, 14 Mar 2007 15:52:33 +0100 |
120 lines |
Re: directory structures - SL5 updates, contrib, etc...
|
Oleg Sadov |
Wed, 14 Mar 2007 18:33:17 +0300 |
123 lines |
evolution - errata or fastbugs
|
Troy Dawson |
Tue, 20 Mar 2007 12:23:52 -0500 |
30 lines |
Re: evolution - errata or fastbugs
|
Troy Dawson |
Tue, 20 Mar 2007 13:06:59 -0500 |
40 lines |
Re: evolution - errata or fastbugs
|
Stephan Wiesand |
Tue, 20 Mar 2007 20:36:03 +0100 |
55 lines |
Re: evolution - errata or fastbugs
|
Jan Iven |
Wed, 21 Mar 2007 09:39:35 +0100 |
67 lines |
Re: evolution - errata or fastbugs
|
Troy Dawson |
Wed, 21 Mar 2007 14:10:49 -0500 |
85 lines |
Re: Future of Scientific Linux (or what next) ? - invitation to a discussion ...
|
Jan Iven |
Thu, 1 Mar 2007 10:55:23 +0100 |
59 lines |
Re: Future of Scientific Linux (or what next) ? - invitation to a discussion ...
|
Urs Beyerle |
Thu, 1 Mar 2007 17:57:34 +0100 |
102 lines |
Re: Future of Scientific Linux (or what next) ? - invitation to a discussion ...
|
Igor Kresnik |
Sun, 4 Mar 2007 10:39:42 +0100 |
18 lines |
Re: Future of Scientific Linux (or what next) ? - invitation to a discussion ...
|
Karanbir Singh |
Mon, 5 Mar 2007 15:17:12 +0000 |
41 lines |
Re: Future of Scientific Linux (or what next) ? - invitation to a discussion ...
|
Troy Dawson |
Wed, 7 Mar 2007 08:42:46 -0600 |
47 lines |
Re: Future of Scientific Linux (or what next) ? - invitation to a discussion ...
|
Stephen John Smoogen |
Wed, 7 Mar 2007 10:37:29 -0700 |
61 lines |
Re: Future of Scientific Linux (or what next) ? - invitation to a discussion ...
|
Connie Sieh |
Wed, 7 Mar 2007 11:46:17 -0600 |
131 lines |
Re: Future of Scientific Linux - Brett's opinion
|
Brett Viren |
Wed, 7 Mar 2007 11:40:11 -0500 |
32 lines |
Re: Future of Scientific Linux - Troy's opinion
|
Troy Dawson |
Thu, 1 Mar 2007 11:43:39 -0600 |
52 lines |
Re: Future of Scientific Linux - Troy's opinion
|
Jaroslaw Polok |
Thu, 1 Mar 2007 19:31:30 +0100 |
22 lines |
Re: Future of Scientific Linux - Troy's opinion
|
Urs Beyerle |
Thu, 1 Mar 2007 20:38:50 +0100 |
34 lines |
Re: Future of Scientific Linux - Troy's opinion
|
Oleg Sadov |
Thu, 1 Mar 2007 22:49:33 +0300 |
63 lines |
Re: Future of Scientific Linux - Troy's opinion
|
Stephan Wiesand |
Fri, 2 Mar 2007 19:31:26 +0100 |
108 lines |
Re: Future of Scientific Linux - Troy's opinion
|
Troy Dawson |
Fri, 2 Mar 2007 13:51:37 -0600 |
53 lines |
Re: Future of Scientific Linux - Troy's opinion
|
Jaroslaw Polok |
Mon, 5 Mar 2007 09:55:02 +0100 |
57 lines |
Re: Future of Scientific Linux - Troy's opinion
|
Axel Thimm |
Mon, 5 Mar 2007 11:12:50 +0100 |
72 lines |
Re: Future of Scientific Linux - Troy's opinion
|
Michel Jouvin |
Wed, 7 Mar 2007 07:46:33 +0100 |
51 lines |
Making/using additional repositories for SL5
|
Jon Peatfield |
Fri, 23 Mar 2007 20:04:12 +0000 |
46 lines |
Re: Making/using additional repositories for SL5
|
Connie Sieh |
Fri, 23 Mar 2007 15:17:58 -0500 |
83 lines |
OpenAFS security issue
|
Stephan Wiesand |
Wed, 21 Mar 2007 12:19:41 +0100 |
42 lines |
Re: OpenAFS security issue
|
Troy Dawson |
Wed, 21 Mar 2007 09:05:19 -0500 |
61 lines |
Re: OpenAFS security issue
|
Stephan Wiesand |
Wed, 21 Mar 2007 15:34:04 +0100 |
60 lines |
Re: OpenAFS security issue
|
Stephan Wiesand |
Wed, 21 Mar 2007 16:28:43 +0100 |
62 lines |
Re: OpenAFS security issue
|
Jan Iven |
Wed, 21 Mar 2007 18:34:02 +0100 |
33 lines |
Re: OpenAFS security issue
|
Troy Dawson |
Wed, 21 Mar 2007 12:38:36 -0500 |
70 lines |
Re: OpenAFS security issue
|
Stephan Wiesand |
Wed, 21 Mar 2007 18:50:17 +0100 |
26 lines |
Re: OpenAFS security issue
|
Stephan Wiesand |
Wed, 21 Mar 2007 19:44:04 +0100 |
29 lines |
Re: OpenAFS security issue
|
Troy Dawson |
Wed, 21 Mar 2007 13:54:19 -0500 |
38 lines |
Re: OpenAFS security issue
|
Stephan Wiesand |
Wed, 21 Mar 2007 20:54:55 +0100 |
62 lines |
Re: Progress of S.L. 5
|
Stephan Wiesand |
Thu, 15 Mar 2007 19:13:27 +0100 |
94 lines |
Re: Progress of S.L. 5
|
Troy Dawson |
Thu, 15 Mar 2007 13:55:14 -0500 |
107 lines |
Re: Progress of S.L. 5
|
Urs Beyerle |
Thu, 15 Mar 2007 20:01:40 +0100 |
118 lines |
Re: Progress of S.L. 5
|
Chris Hunter |
Thu, 15 Mar 2007 15:01:55 -0400 |
137 lines |
Re: Progress of S.L. 5
|
Jaroslaw Polok |
Fri, 16 Mar 2007 09:25:55 +0100 |
42 lines |
Re: Proposed packages
|
Troy Dawson |
Wed, 7 Mar 2007 08:24:31 -0600 |
36 lines |
Scientific Linux "Second Alpha Release" of 5.0 for i386 and is now available for testing
|
Troy Dawson |
Thu, 8 Mar 2007 10:53:19 -0600 |
154 lines |
Re: Scientific Linux "Second Alpha Release" of 5.0 for i386 and is now available for testing
|
Troy Dawson |
Thu, 8 Mar 2007 13:13:41 -0600 |
184 lines |
Scientific Linux "Second Alpha Release" of 5.0 for x86_64 and is now available for testing
|
Troy Dawson |
Thu, 8 Mar 2007 11:01:38 -0600 |
141 lines |
Re: Scientific Linux "Second Alpha Release" of 5.0 for x86_64 and is now available for testing
|
Troy Dawson |
Fri, 9 Mar 2007 08:50:15 -0600 |
139 lines |
Re: Scientific Linux "Second Alpha Release" of 5.0 for x86_64 and is now available for testing
|
Stephan Wiesand |
Tue, 13 Mar 2007 19:59:24 +0100 |
45 lines |
Re: Scientific Linux "Second Alpha Release" of 5.0 for x86_64 and is now available for testing
|
Stephen John Smoogen |
Tue, 13 Mar 2007 14:42:31 -0600 |
49 lines |
SL-5 yum
|
Karanbir Singh |
Sun, 11 Mar 2007 00:48:57 +0000 |
26 lines |
Re: SL-5 yum
|
Troy Dawson |
Mon, 12 Mar 2007 08:53:48 -0500 |
58 lines |
Re: SL-5 yum
|
Stephan Wiesand |
Mon, 12 Mar 2007 16:34:01 +0100 |
42 lines |
Re: SL-5 yum
|
Karanbir Singh |
Tue, 13 Mar 2007 20:05:38 +0000 |
55 lines |
Re: SL-5 yum
|
Troy Dawson |
Tue, 13 Mar 2007 15:29:45 -0500 |
96 lines |
Re: SL-5 yum
|
Stephen John Smoogen |
Tue, 13 Mar 2007 14:58:53 -0600 |
83 lines |
Re: SL-5 yum
|
Troy Dawson |
Wed, 14 Mar 2007 08:54:15 -0500 |
92 lines |
Re: SL-5 yum
|
Stephen John Smoogen |
Wed, 14 Mar 2007 12:25:51 -0600 |
53 lines |
Re: SL-5 yum
|
Karanbir Singh |
Thu, 15 Mar 2007 21:12:26 +0000 |
52 lines |
Re: SL-5 yum
|
Karanbir Singh |
Thu, 15 Mar 2007 21:15:59 +0000 |
38 lines |
Re: SL-5 yum
|
Connie Sieh |
Tue, 20 Mar 2007 11:56:04 -0500 |
57 lines |
Re: SL-5 yum
|
Karanbir Singh |
Tue, 20 Mar 2007 17:55:02 +0000 |
24 lines |
Re: SL5 kernel module plugin
|
Troy Dawson |
Mon, 5 Mar 2007 13:55:42 -0600 |
282 lines |
SSH timeout, old question, but bothering
|
Kuo Kan Liang |
Fri, 16 Mar 2007 03:10:59 +0800 |
35 lines |
Re: SSH timeout, old question, but bothering
|
Matt Cuttler |
Thu, 15 Mar 2007 15:34:09 -0400 |
42 lines |
Testing: SL_afs_nosuid
|
Troy Dawson |
Wed, 21 Mar 2007 16:30:26 -0500 |
67 lines |
Will gcc-3.2.3-58 come to SL?
|
Alex Owen |
Fri, 30 Mar 2007 23:52:40 +0100 |
26 lines |
Re: Will gcc-3.2.3-58 come to SL?
|
Connie Sieh |
Fri, 30 Mar 2007 18:18:28 -0500 |
39 lines |
Re: Will gcc-3.2.3-58 come to SL?
|
Alex Owen |
Sat, 31 Mar 2007 22:10:14 +0100 |
29 lines |
Yum in SL5
|
Troy Dawson |
Fri, 23 Mar 2007 10:21:11 -0500 |
108 lines |
Re: Yum in SL5
|
Troy Dawson |
Fri, 23 Mar 2007 10:32:26 -0500 |
123 lines |
Re: Yum in SL5
|
Bly, MJ (Martin) |
Fri, 23 Mar 2007 16:53:35 +0000 |
187 lines |
Re: Yum in SL5
|
Stephan Wiesand |
Fri, 23 Mar 2007 18:39:13 +0100 |
45 lines |
Re: Yum in SL5
|
Troy Dawson |
Fri, 23 Mar 2007 13:44:55 -0500 |
179 lines |
yum-conf format
|
Troy Dawson |
Wed, 14 Mar 2007 11:25:53 -0500 |
44 lines |
Re: yum-conf format
|
Karanbir Singh |
Thu, 15 Mar 2007 21:17:11 +0000 |
48 lines |
Re: yum-conf format
|
Troy Dawson |
Thu, 15 Mar 2007 16:41:19 -0500 |
33 lines |
Re: yum-conf format
|
Stephen John Smoogen |
Thu, 15 Mar 2007 17:14:32 -0600 |
56 lines |
Re: yum-conf format
|
Bly, MJ (Martin) |
Thu, 15 Mar 2007 23:16:25 +0000 |
55 lines |
Re: yum-conf format
|
Karanbir Singh |
Thu, 15 Mar 2007 23:40:59 +0000 |
30 lines |
Re: yum-conf format
|
Karanbir Singh |
Thu, 15 Mar 2007 23:42:16 +0000 |
32 lines |
Re: yum-conf format
|
Jaroslaw Polok |
Fri, 16 Mar 2007 09:58:33 +0100 |
84 lines |
Re: yum-conf format
|
Alex Owen |
Fri, 16 Mar 2007 09:59:25 +0000 |
28 lines |
Re: yum-conf format
|
Troy Dawson |
Fri, 16 Mar 2007 08:41:57 -0500 |
48 lines |
Re: yum-conf format
|
Troy Dawson |
Fri, 16 Mar 2007 08:50:43 -0500 |
46 lines |
Re: yum-conf format
|
Troy Dawson |
Fri, 16 Mar 2007 08:53:30 -0500 |
88 lines |
Re: yum-conf format
|
Jaroslaw Polok |
Mon, 19 Mar 2007 11:30:54 +0100 |
46 lines |
Re: yum-conf format
|
Troy Dawson |
Mon, 19 Mar 2007 10:09:40 -0500 |
52 lines |
Re: yum-conf format
|
Jaroslaw Polok |
Mon, 19 Mar 2007 17:01:08 +0100 |
39 lines |
Re: yum-conf format
|
Karanbir Singh |
Mon, 19 Mar 2007 16:21:31 +0000 |
24 lines |
Re: yum-conf format
|
Jaroslaw Polok |
Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:07:15 +0100 |
36 lines |
Re: yum-conf format
|
Owen Synge |
Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:23:32 +0100 |
71 lines |
Re: yum-conf format
|
Stephan Wiesand |
Mon, 19 Mar 2007 20:17:38 +0100 |
46 lines |
Re: yum-conf format
|
Karanbir Singh |
Mon, 19 Mar 2007 21:19:58 +0000 |
33 lines |
Re: yum-conf format
|
Karanbir Singh |
Mon, 19 Mar 2007 21:23:27 +0000 |
32 lines |
