Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >> Everyone hasn't *moved* to including the yum configuration in the main >> release package, it's always been that way. And we've always pulled it >> out. It's been that way since yum 1.0. > > Sorry people talking past each other alert :) > > What Karanbir is talking about is in the redhat-release, or > centos-release package. When you go to the dell, dag, etc > repositories, you get a dell-release, dag-release, livna-release etc > that contains the /etc/livna-release file and the stuff to stick in > /etc/yum.repos.d/ directory. > > I hope that is a bit clearer. > Thanks for clearing that up, I was a bit confused about Troy's reply :) -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219@icq