I'm with you Troy.  Keep the conf files separate.  In fact, I'd rather
there was an RPM for each 'repository', so I can leave them all out and
create my own for our local mirrors.  But maybe that's a tad extreme.

Martin. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [log in to unmask] 
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On 
> Behalf Of Troy Dawson
> Sent: 15 March 2007 21:41
> To: Karanbir Singh
> Cc: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: yum-conf format
> 
> Karanbir Singh wrote:
> > 
> > Considering everyone has moved to including the yumconfigs in the 
> > -release package, I wonder why you are still shipping alternate 
> > yumconf packages?
> > 
> > - KB
> 
> Everyone hasn't *moved* to including the yum configuration in 
> the main release package, it's always been that way.  And 
> we've always pulled it out.  It's been that way since yum 1.0.
> And I've always wondered why people put it in the main 
> package of yum. 
> Yes, yum has to have a yum-conf in order for it to do 
> anything, but why replace an entire program, just to change 
> it's configuration file.
> Troy
> --
> __________________________________________________
> Troy Dawson  [log in to unmask]  (630)840-6468 Fermilab  
> ComputingDivision/LCSI/CSI DSS Group 
> __________________________________________________
>