I'm with you Troy. Keep the conf files separate. In fact, I'd rather there was an RPM for each 'repository', so I can leave them all out and create my own for our local mirrors. But maybe that's a tad extreme. Martin. > -----Original Message----- > From: [log in to unmask] > [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On > Behalf Of Troy Dawson > Sent: 15 March 2007 21:41 > To: Karanbir Singh > Cc: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Re: yum-conf format > > Karanbir Singh wrote: > > > > Considering everyone has moved to including the yumconfigs in the > > -release package, I wonder why you are still shipping alternate > > yumconf packages? > > > > - KB > > Everyone hasn't *moved* to including the yum configuration in > the main release package, it's always been that way. And > we've always pulled it out. It's been that way since yum 1.0. > And I've always wondered why people put it in the main > package of yum. > Yes, yum has to have a yum-conf in order for it to do > anything, but why replace an entire program, just to change > it's configuration file. > Troy > -- > __________________________________________________ > Troy Dawson [log in to unmask] (630)840-6468 Fermilab > ComputingDivision/LCSI/CSI DSS Group > __________________________________________________ >