On 3/13/07, Stephan Wiesand <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hi Troy,
>
> On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, Troy Dawson wrote:
>
> > The Scientific Linux developers are pleased to announce our "Second
> > Alpha Release" of Scientific Linux 5.0
> >
> > This is not for production use.
> > This release will change *dramatically* before the final release.
>
> I really hope it won't.
>
> I ks-installed both the x86 and x86_64 flavours. It just worked, and I
> haven't found any problems yet that would not be present in TUV's beta2
> as well.
>
> > You have been warned.
>
> Ok...
>
> It's still good to have the familiar repository structure back. Thanks.
> NB It seems CentOS made the same decision. I personally think both
> projects are right here.
>

Well there is a difference.. CentOS went with /Centos/<stuff> and it
looks like SciLin went with /SL/RPMS/<stuff> which is closer to the
older layout.

-- 
Stephen J Smoogen. -- CSIRT/Linux System Administrator
How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed
in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice"