On 3/13/07, Stephan Wiesand <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Hi Troy, > > On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, Troy Dawson wrote: > > > The Scientific Linux developers are pleased to announce our "Second > > Alpha Release" of Scientific Linux 5.0 > > > > This is not for production use. > > This release will change *dramatically* before the final release. > > I really hope it won't. > > I ks-installed both the x86 and x86_64 flavours. It just worked, and I > haven't found any problems yet that would not be present in TUV's beta2 > as well. > > > You have been warned. > > Ok... > > It's still good to have the familiar repository structure back. Thanks. > NB It seems CentOS made the same decision. I personally think both > projects are right here. > Well there is a difference.. CentOS went with /Centos/<stuff> and it looks like SciLin went with /SL/RPMS/<stuff> which is closer to the older layout. -- Stephen J Smoogen. -- CSIRT/Linux System Administrator How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice"