Troy Dawson wrote:
> Troy Dawson wrote:
> 
[...]
> Hi Jarek,
> Sorry for the delay in replying to this.  Especially when we're 
> releasing.  But the end result is that we're sticking with yum-2.0.7-11.SL.
> 
> In your tests, you never actually said 'Y' to it.  If you had you would 
> find that when Yum says "Update" it means Update in the same sense that 
> rpm says Update.  That is, if there is something older, then it will 
> really update it, but if that something isn't even installed, then it 
> will just install it.
> So yum was working correctly, but I will admit that it is a little 
> confusing saying 'Update' when it's really an 'Install'  But anyway, 
> here is the test of yum-2.0.7-11.SL  (with alot of details taken out, 
> which I have if you want)

I'm terribly sorry to cause the additional (and unnecessary ..)
work for you ..

Apparently what happened is that I fully tested with 2.0.9
and then assumed that yum 2.0.11 will behave the same ...

My fault ... too much autosuggestion :-(

Thanks for testing this.

Jarek

__
-------------------------------------------------------
_ Jaroslaw_Polok ___________________ CERN - IT/ADC/LE _
_ http://home.cern.ch/~jpolok ___ tel_+41_22_767_1834 _
_____________________________________ +41_78_792_0795 _