Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 1 Aug 2005 09:16:36 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Jaroslaw Polok wrote:
> Troy Dawson wrote:
>
>> Troy Dawson wrote:
>>
> [...]
>
>> Hi Jarek,
>> Sorry for the delay in replying to this. Especially when we're
>> releasing. But the end result is that we're sticking with
>> yum-2.0.7-11.SL.
>>
>> In your tests, you never actually said 'Y' to it. If you had you
>> would find that when Yum says "Update" it means Update in the same
>> sense that rpm says Update. That is, if there is something older,
>> then it will really update it, but if that something isn't even
>> installed, then it will just install it.
>> So yum was working correctly, but I will admit that it is a little
>> confusing saying 'Update' when it's really an 'Install' But anyway,
>> here is the test of yum-2.0.7-11.SL (with alot of details taken out,
>> which I have if you want)
>
>
> I'm terribly sorry to cause the additional (and unnecessary ..)
> work for you ..
>
> Apparently what happened is that I fully tested with 2.0.9
> and then assumed that yum 2.0.11 will behave the same ...
>
> My fault ... too much autosuggestion :-(
>
> Thanks for testing this.
>
> Jarek
>
It actually wasn't too much trouble. It helped me learn more about what
is going on in yum. They say you learn something new everyday ... and
that was what I learned that day ;)
Troy
--
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson [log in to unmask] (630)840-6468
Fermilab ComputingDivision/CSS CSI Group
__________________________________________________
|
|
|