Troy Dawson wrote: > Troy Dawson wrote: > [...] > Hi Jarek, > Sorry for the delay in replying to this. Especially when we're > releasing. But the end result is that we're sticking with yum-2.0.7-11.SL. > > In your tests, you never actually said 'Y' to it. If you had you would > find that when Yum says "Update" it means Update in the same sense that > rpm says Update. That is, if there is something older, then it will > really update it, but if that something isn't even installed, then it > will just install it. > So yum was working correctly, but I will admit that it is a little > confusing saying 'Update' when it's really an 'Install' But anyway, > here is the test of yum-2.0.7-11.SL (with alot of details taken out, > which I have if you want) I'm terribly sorry to cause the additional (and unnecessary ..) work for you .. Apparently what happened is that I fully tested with 2.0.9 and then assumed that yum 2.0.11 will behave the same ... My fault ... too much autosuggestion :-( Thanks for testing this. Jarek __ ------------------------------------------------------- _ Jaroslaw_Polok ___________________ CERN - IT/ADC/LE _ _ http://home.cern.ch/~jpolok ___ tel_+41_22_767_1834 _ _____________________________________ +41_78_792_0795 _