Sender: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 14 May 2012 18:51:44 +0200 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=UTF-8 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Comments: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On 05/14/2012 06:39 PM, Christopher Tooley wrote:
>> It isn't clear if you are looking to provide your user with some
>> voluntary self-filtering or if your user wants to impose filtering on
>> others.
>
> Ah, apologies to everyone! (I was curious about the "political" statement). It is indeed *self* inflicted. The user is having trouble getting his work done and finds his own behaviour online detrimental to his work process.
>
>> People gave you ideas about the latter. For the former there
>> are various browser plugins that your user can install to self-manage
>> their own filtering. For example Chrome's "Personal Blocklist"
>> extension. Although the emphasis there looks to be default-allow rather
>> than default-deny.
>
> I figured if the user has issues to the point of requesting that I whitelist websites he may not find a plugin for browsers useful (i.e. easy to circumvent), however, I did encounter these options as well in my google searches so I will suggest this as an option.
>
> Thanks everyone!
> -Chris
hello Chris,
you can try squid/squidguard or dansguardian, but, again, the user can
circumvent the proxy setting in his browser if this isn't enforced
(transparent proxy)
Gilberto
--
--
|
|
|