On 05/14/2012 06:39 PM, Christopher Tooley wrote: >> It isn't clear if you are looking to provide your user with some >> voluntary self-filtering or if your user wants to impose filtering on >> others. > > Ah, apologies to everyone! (I was curious about the "political" statement). It is indeed *self* inflicted. The user is having trouble getting his work done and finds his own behaviour online detrimental to his work process. > >> People gave you ideas about the latter. For the former there >> are various browser plugins that your user can install to self-manage >> their own filtering. For example Chrome's "Personal Blocklist" >> extension. Although the emphasis there looks to be default-allow rather >> than default-deny. > > I figured if the user has issues to the point of requesting that I whitelist websites he may not find a plugin for browsers useful (i.e. easy to circumvent), however, I did encounter these options as well in my google searches so I will suggest this as an option. > > Thanks everyone! > -Chris hello Chris, you can try squid/squidguard or dansguardian, but, again, the user can circumvent the proxy setting in his browser if this isn't enforced (transparent proxy) Gilberto -- --