SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

December 2020

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Springdale Linux
From:
Konstantin Olchanski <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Konstantin Olchanski <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 14 Dec 2020 13:10:54 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines) 
>
> > and ... CentOS RPMs are not 100% safe ...
>

This is a very unexpected statement. I feel it should not be passed unquestioned.

Is there any meat there or it's just a general statement on the security
of the CentOS build process vs the security of the Red Hat build process
vs the security of the Princeton build process? (including signatures of source code,
signatures of binary packages, security of the mirror network, etc).

-- 
Konstantin Olchanski
Data Acquisition Systems: The Bytes Must Flow!
Email: olchansk-at-triumf-dot-ca
Snail mail: 4004 Wesbrook Mall, TRIUMF, Vancouver, B.C., V6T 2A3, Canada

ATOM RSS1 RSS2