SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

November 2009

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Artem Trunov <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Artem Trunov <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 4 Nov 2009 01:08:42 +0100
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1151 bytes) , text/html (1593 bytes)
Hi, Graham!

New Intel NICs are pretty stable in our SL5 servers, giving now problems. We
have also, Netxen, Chelsio. Intel works w/o much tuning straigh out of the
box. And has some potential - with newer (newer then SL5, or custom
compiled) kernels you should be able to use it's DMA and multiple receieve
interrupt vectors. Make sure you've got  the latest driver from Intel.

cheers
Artem.

On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 10:08 PM, Graham Allan <[log in to unmask]>wrote:

> I'm curious if anyone has any positive or negative experiences with the
> various 10Gbe NICs available, in an SL5 system?
>
> I've heard of instability when using the Intel NICs (this on a CentOS 5
> system, but I assume similar behaviour to SL), good reports on the
> Myricom NICs, and another positive report on Chelsio from our
> supercomputing guys (though I believe they are running Suse).
>
> Thanks,
>
> Graham
> --
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Graham Allan - I.T. Manager - [log in to unmask] - (612) 624-5040
> School of Physics and Astronomy - University of Minnesota
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>


ATOM RSS1 RSS2