Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 21 Feb 2020 16:41:45 +0100 |
Content-Type: | multipart/alternative |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi,
I'm surprised by the so negative feeling against CentOS which is a great
project too and has been working well since it was "acquired" by Red
Hat. I see no official sign that it should change. Moving from SL to
CentOS is straightforward, I don't think you can speak about it as a
migration as it is exactly the same product. And staying with CentOS
will give you a chance to meet the DUNE people at some point and more
generally the HEP community if you liked interacting with it!
Cheers,
Michel
Le 21/02/2020 à 16:32, Peter Willis a écrit :
>
> Hello,
>
>
> Thanks to everyone for clarifying the future status of SL.
>
> I guess it’s time to start researching he docs for Ubuntu/Debian or
> something.
>
> Looks like we need to revise our computing cluster plan.
>
> The computer here is pretty small with only two nodes and a controller
> totalling 112 CPUs.
>
> We use it for numerical modelling of ocean and river currents and
> sediment transport (OpenMP/MPICH/FORTRAN).
>
> The changeover will be pretty small. We are still waiting for the OK
> for a new node or two.
>
> The current nodes are ten years old. The update to a controller and
> SL7 was a last ditch effort to join the two nodes and increase the
> scale of the models without costing too much more.
>
> In other news, the link you shared has an article about ‘DUNE’ which
> seems like an interesting project.
>
> I’d certainly frostbite a few toes to just stand around and watch that
> thing run experiments.
>
> Thanks for the info,
>
> Peter
>
> >Hello Peter,
>
> >
>
> >> Is Scientific Linux still active?
>
> >Scientific Linux 6 and 7 will be supported until they are EOL, but
> there will be no SL8.
>
> >
>
> >Here is the official announcement from last April:
>
> >
>
> >https://listserv.fnal.gov/scripts/wa.exe?A2=ind1904&L=SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS&P=817
>
> >
>
> >Bonnie King
>
|
|
|