SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

February 2009

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailling list for Scientific Linux users worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:37:33 -0600
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject:
Re: AFS on XFS or ext3?
From:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-transfer-encoding:
7BIT
Comments:
To: Michael Mansour <[log in to unmask]> cc: Scientific Linux Users mailing list <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines) 
OK, Enough of this religious file system bashing.  If this doesn't stop, 
people are going to be taken off the list.

Michael, you said something that is completely false, and I need to 
correct what you said.

> 
> Red Hat = Scientific Linux, so if it's not supported by TUV then it's not
> supported by SL.
> 

Red Hat does *NOT* equal Scientific Linux.  Scientific Linux adds more 
stuff into it's release that RedHat does.  Scientific Linux supports 
those extra products as best we can, which is often a "best effort" support.

Troy

-- 
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson  [log in to unmask]  (630)840-6468
Fermilab  ComputingDivision/LCSI/CSI DSS Group
__________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2