SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

May 2011

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Denis Fateyev <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Denis Fateyev <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 21 May 2011 12:25:55 +0600
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (878 bytes) , text/html (1857 bytes)
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Braja Kishore Chattaraj <
[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> One difference I notice is your link points to http://ftp..... while the
> one I used through the SL website points to http://ftp1..... website.
> Those are probably 2 separate servers.
>


Though, I believe the files on the mirrors are identical. But who knows..
Sure, I didn't tried from "ftp1.", but I can confirm that files from "ftp."
are ok.



>
> What utility did you use to compute the checksum of the ISO files?
>
>
There are *'sha1sum'* for sha1 and* 'sha256sum'* for sha256 algorithms, of
course.

You have to download* 'SHA1SUM' *and *'SHA256SUM'* files from the same
directory with ISOs, and then you may check the integrity with the following
commands:
 * *$ sha1sum -c SHA1SUM
and
  $ sha256sum -c SHA256SUM

(you should see positive checking results with the files you have
downloaded.)


---
wbr, Denis.


ATOM RSS1 RSS2