SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

December 2020

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Konstantin Olchanski <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Konstantin Olchanski <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 14 Dec 2020 13:46:23 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 01:27:31PM -0800, Yasha Karant wrote:
> >>
> >>>and ... CentOS RPMs are not 100% safe ...
> >
> >This is a very unexpected statement. I feel it should not be passed unquestioned.
> >

To followup on myself. Need a definition of "unsafe". Must make
a distinction between "centos is unsafe" vs "redhat is unsafe" vs
"linux is unsafe" vs "any use of computer is unsafe".

("safe as certified by recognized authority" need not apply,
cars and airplanes are certified for safety, but still crash).

-- 
Konstantin Olchanski
Data Acquisition Systems: The Bytes Must Flow!
Email: olchansk-at-triumf-dot-ca
Snail mail: 4004 Wesbrook Mall, TRIUMF, Vancouver, B.C., V6T 2A3, Canada

ATOM RSS1 RSS2