SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

June 2008

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailling list for Scientific Linux users worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 24 Jun 2008 14:51:49 -0500
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
[log in to unmask]
Content-type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject:
Thank you, Re: Wrong md5sum's on SL 5.2 x86_64?
From:
Robert Burch <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-transfer-encoding:
7BIT
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (43 lines) 
Thanks, sorry for the noise...

Confused :)

Robert

Connie Sieh wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jun 2008, Robert Burch wrote:
> 
>> Dear All,
>>
>> Are the md5sum's for SL 5.2 x86_64 iso's OK?
>>
>> I pulled down SL 52 x86_64 iso's (Tue Jun 24 13:02:36 CDT 2008) from:
>> ftp://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/52/iso/x86_64/
>> Ran my md5sum against them, but they did not match.
>>
>> [me@xxxxx]$ md5sum SL.52.061808.x86_64.disc1.iso
>> 937abd48c9a56fb41339a9ab50f53ab6  SL.52.061808.x86_64.disc1.iso
> 
> These are sha1sum's not md5sum.
> TUV switched from md5sum to sha1sum on RHEL 5.
> 
> [root@linux44 x86_64]# sha1sum SL.52.061808.x86_64.disc1.iso
> 079dd3540db6f9b9b21f06883a8ad89e20231680  SL.52.061808.x86_64.disc1.iso
> 
>>
>> [me@xxxxx]$ cat SL.52.061808.x86_64.SHA1SUM
>> 079dd3540db6f9b9b21f06883a8ad89e20231680  SL.52.061808.x86_64.disc1.iso
>> ...
>>
>> Or am I confused?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Robert Burch Jr
>> Cyclotron Institute, Texas A&M University
>>
>> PS Great job on SL and this list!!
>>
> 
> -Connie Sieh

ATOM RSS1 RSS2