Thanks, sorry for the noise... Confused :) Robert Connie Sieh wrote: > On Tue, 24 Jun 2008, Robert Burch wrote: > >> Dear All, >> >> Are the md5sum's for SL 5.2 x86_64 iso's OK? >> >> I pulled down SL 52 x86_64 iso's (Tue Jun 24 13:02:36 CDT 2008) from: >> ftp://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/52/iso/x86_64/ >> Ran my md5sum against them, but they did not match. >> >> [me@xxxxx]$ md5sum SL.52.061808.x86_64.disc1.iso >> 937abd48c9a56fb41339a9ab50f53ab6 SL.52.061808.x86_64.disc1.iso > > These are sha1sum's not md5sum. > TUV switched from md5sum to sha1sum on RHEL 5. > > [root@linux44 x86_64]# sha1sum SL.52.061808.x86_64.disc1.iso > 079dd3540db6f9b9b21f06883a8ad89e20231680 SL.52.061808.x86_64.disc1.iso > >> >> [me@xxxxx]$ cat SL.52.061808.x86_64.SHA1SUM >> 079dd3540db6f9b9b21f06883a8ad89e20231680 SL.52.061808.x86_64.disc1.iso >> ... >> >> Or am I confused? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Robert Burch Jr >> Cyclotron Institute, Texas A&M University >> >> PS Great job on SL and this list!! >> > > -Connie Sieh