SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

May 2011

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Zack Yovel <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Zack Yovel <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 26 May 2011 16:29:41 +0300
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1006 bytes) , text/html (1456 bytes)
2011/5/26 Phong Nguyen <[log in to unmask]>

>
> On 25 May 2011, at 1557, Zack Yovel wrote:
> >
> > Funny, the reason I need windows is virtualization. I have tons of
> Hyper-V machines that I need for a course I take, and from what I've seen
> QEMU/KVM are missing 'revert snapshot'-like feature which is extremely
> important to me. Tried using these VHD's in Virtualbox, It's doesn't work
> really good. so for now, windows host should stay.
>
> If you're going to be using Hyper-V (either in bare-metal or full Windows
> Server mode) will you need to bother with dual-booting? Why not just run
> Linux virtualized?
>
> - Phong


1. Hyper-V does not support RHEL. The only linux distro it supports is SUSE.
2. The advantage I experienced using KVM/QEMU over Hyper-V in performance
was amazing. I need Hyper-V, I want KVM/QEMU..
Besides, I don't want to get to know SL only from a Hyper-V machine..

Anyway it's no big deal not to user RAID at all (or use it only in linux).
If there is no driver than there is no driver. That's it..


ATOM RSS1 RSS2