Sender: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 2 Dec 2005 19:00:53 -0500 |
MIME-version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-type: |
text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-transfer-encoding: |
7BIT |
Comments: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I'd try pdf2ps (included as part of Ghostscript on SL4) instead of
Acrobat reader and see what happens.
AFAIK, Ghostscript doesn't share any code with Adobe products -- perhaps
it will work better? Also, the print-button in xpdf can generate
postscript too. There's a ps2pdf command, too, which can generate a PDF
document from any postscript output that you like.
It's worth a shot, anyway...
-Luke
Miles O'Neal wrote:
>Bog standard SL304, Acrobat Reader 7:
>
>We have a PDF document from a customer that
>we can't print. Other PDFs print fine,
>but when we try to print this one we get
>garbage. I printed it to a file, and the
>PostScript has the same garbage. For instance
>the words 'Java Core' comes out '3040)5 &$%';
>the word 'Espresso' comes out '!"#$%""&''
>
>The document displays fine. It uses Arial
>and New Times Roman fonts. We don't have
>Arial on our systems, but Reader subs
>something rational. But printing - to a
>file, or any of our printers (standard PS
>or HPCL) gives us the same, bogus results.
>
>Any ideas?
>
>Thanks,
>Miles
>
>
|
|
|