SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

March 2007

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Maillling list for Scientific Linux developers worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 14 Mar 2007 09:12:43 -0500
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
"Marc W. Mengel" <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject:
Re: directory structures - SL5 updates, contrib, etc...
From:
"Marc W. Mengel" <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-transfer-encoding:
7BIT
Comments:
To: Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]> cc: [log in to unmask]
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines) 
> Currently, SL 3.x and 4.x has the directory structure
> 
> 4.4/i386/errata
> 4.4/i386/contrib
> 4.4/i386/SL/RPMS
> 
> Where everything is pushed up into the arch directory.  CentOS has 
> things at
> 
> 4.4/contrib/i386
> 4.4/updates/i386
> 4.4/os/i386/CentOS/RPMS
> 

I think generally pushing the architecture type differences deeper (i.e. 
the CentOS layout) is easier to follow.  In fact, it would be, from that
perspective, nicer to do
   4.4/SL/RPMS/i386
but that's just me :-)

Marc

ATOM RSS1 RSS2