Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 1 Aug 2005 09:55:13 +0200 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Troy Dawson wrote:
> Troy Dawson wrote:
>
[...]
> Hi Jarek,
> Sorry for the delay in replying to this. Especially when we're
> releasing. But the end result is that we're sticking with yum-2.0.7-11.SL.
>
> In your tests, you never actually said 'Y' to it. If you had you would
> find that when Yum says "Update" it means Update in the same sense that
> rpm says Update. That is, if there is something older, then it will
> really update it, but if that something isn't even installed, then it
> will just install it.
> So yum was working correctly, but I will admit that it is a little
> confusing saying 'Update' when it's really an 'Install' But anyway,
> here is the test of yum-2.0.7-11.SL (with alot of details taken out,
> which I have if you want)
I'm terribly sorry to cause the additional (and unnecessary ..)
work for you ..
Apparently what happened is that I fully tested with 2.0.9
and then assumed that yum 2.0.11 will behave the same ...
My fault ... too much autosuggestion :-(
Thanks for testing this.
Jarek
__
-------------------------------------------------------
_ Jaroslaw_Polok ___________________ CERN - IT/ADC/LE _
_ http://home.cern.ch/~jpolok ___ tel_+41_22_767_1834 _
_____________________________________ +41_78_792_0795 _
|
|
|