Sender: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 20 Jul 2005 08:57:51 -0500 |
MIME-version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-type: |
text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-transfer-encoding: |
7BIT |
Comments: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Jaroslaw Polok wrote:
> Hi
>
>
>> I just want to double check, which version of yum are you working
>> with. Can you send
>>
>> rpm -q yum
>
>
> Hmm , I'm actually using our own version:
>
> yum-2.0.7-9.1.SL.cern (at the time we needed it the SL
> version was not working properly on ia64..)
>
> but looking at the code 2.0.7-11.SL is mostly the same.
> (in nevral.py) - except additional call to kernelmoduledeps()
> in depsolver part: but maybe that makes the difference ?
>
> As I said: we are not using yum extenisvely on SLC3: so
> I would be glad to know if others hae seen that problem ?
>
> Jarek
Yes, the 2.0.7-11 fixes a problem we were having, basically because we
were only doing the kernel-module check when doing upgrades, and not
installs (or was it vice versa, I can't remember)
But ... I also know that I was doing the testing on an i386, so it is
possible that might be something amiss when running on the x86_64.
Troy
--
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson [log in to unmask] (630)840-6468
Fermilab ComputingDivision/CSS CSI Group
__________________________________________________
|
|
|