Jaroslaw Polok wrote: > Hi > > >> I just want to double check, which version of yum are you working >> with. Can you send >> >> rpm -q yum > > > Hmm , I'm actually using our own version: > > yum-2.0.7-9.1.SL.cern (at the time we needed it the SL > version was not working properly on ia64..) > > but looking at the code 2.0.7-11.SL is mostly the same. > (in nevral.py) - except additional call to kernelmoduledeps() > in depsolver part: but maybe that makes the difference ? > > As I said: we are not using yum extenisvely on SLC3: so > I would be glad to know if others hae seen that problem ? > > Jarek Yes, the 2.0.7-11 fixes a problem we were having, basically because we were only doing the kernel-module check when doing upgrades, and not installs (or was it vice versa, I can't remember) But ... I also know that I was doing the testing on an i386, so it is possible that might be something amiss when running on the x86_64. Troy -- __________________________________________________ Troy Dawson [log in to unmask] (630)840-6468 Fermilab ComputingDivision/CSS CSI Group __________________________________________________