Jaroslaw Polok wrote:
> Hi
> 
> 
>> I just want to double check, which version of yum are you working 
>> with.  Can you send
>>
>>   rpm -q yum
> 
> 
> Hmm , I'm actually using our own version:
> 
> yum-2.0.7-9.1.SL.cern (at the time we needed it the SL
> version was not working properly on ia64..)
> 
> but looking at the code 2.0.7-11.SL is mostly the same.
> (in nevral.py) - except additional call to kernelmoduledeps()
> in depsolver part: but maybe that makes the difference ?
> 
> As I said: we are not using yum extenisvely on SLC3: so
> I would be glad to know if others hae seen that problem ?
> 
> Jarek

Yes, the 2.0.7-11 fixes a problem we were having, basically because we 
were only doing the kernel-module check when doing upgrades, and not 
installs (or was it vice versa, I can't remember)

But ... I also know that I was doing the testing on an i386, so it is 
possible that might be something amiss when running on the x86_64.

Troy
-- 
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson  [log in to unmask]  (630)840-6468
Fermilab  ComputingDivision/CSS  CSI Group
__________________________________________________