Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 14 Mar 2007 14:10:15 +0000 |
Content-Type: | TEXT/PLAIN |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007, Troy Dawson wrote:
> Currently, SL 3.x and 4.x has the directory structure
>
> 4.4/i386/errata
> 4.4/i386/contrib
> 4.4/i386/SL/RPMS
>
> Where everything is pushed up into the arch directory. CentOS has things at
>
> 4.4/contrib/i386
> 4.4/updates/i386
> 4.4/os/i386/CentOS/RPMS
>
> So that the division is down before the arch.
>
> I don't think we should change SL3 or 4, that would confuse users too much.
> But what are people's opinions about moving to that directory structure for
> SL5.
>
> The biggest plus I see is that it would make things easier to mirror.
I think that this is a BIG plus.
> It might make things a little confusing for those longtime SL people, but
> some of them might like it. To be honest, I haven't had anyone come to me
> asking where the errata directory was, so the current scheme must not be too
> hard to figure out.
Hmm... for what it's worth it took me quite some time to figure out where
the errata was etc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr Richard Alexander Owen Physicist/Programmer
Queen Mary, University of London Tel: 0207 882 5054
Physics Department Email: [log in to unmask]
Mile End Road
London E1 4NS, UK
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|