On Tue, 25 Mar 2014, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 03/25/2014 12:48 PM, Andras Horvath wrote:
>> Would this mean that the support of the minor branches would end and
>> only the most recent minor version would get the long term support? If
>> so, then I strongly believe that one of the most precious advantages of
>> SL would disappear - compared to CentOS AFAIK.
>>
>>
>
> How do these point releases map to RHEL point releases ? And what level
> of testing is done to ensure sanity within that point release in SL ?
>
>
RHEL 6.1 --> SL 6.1
RHEL 6.2 --> SL 6.2
We "repoclose" everything to verify that all packages dependencies can be
met within a point release, including fastbugs and security errata. We
also test selected packages to make sure they work within a point release.
-Connie Sieh