On Tue, 25 Mar 2014, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 03/25/2014 12:48 PM, Andras Horvath wrote: >> Would this mean that the support of the minor branches would end and >> only the most recent minor version would get the long term support? If >> so, then I strongly believe that one of the most precious advantages of >> SL would disappear - compared to CentOS AFAIK. >> >> > > How do these point releases map to RHEL point releases ? And what level > of testing is done to ensure sanity within that point release in SL ? > > RHEL 6.1 --> SL 6.1 RHEL 6.2 --> SL 6.2 We "repoclose" everything to verify that all packages dependencies can be met within a point release, including fastbugs and security errata. We also test selected packages to make sure they work within a point release. -Connie Sieh