SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

March 2007

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Maillling list for Scientific Linux developers worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 13 Mar 2007 19:59:24 +0100
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Stephan Wiesand <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Subject:
Re: Scientific Linux "Second Alpha Release" of 5.0 for x86_64 and is now available for testing
From:
Stephan Wiesand <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Comments:
To: Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]> cc: [log in to unmask]
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (33 lines) 
Hi Troy,

On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, Troy Dawson wrote:

> The Scientific Linux developers are pleased to announce our "Second
> Alpha Release" of Scientific Linux 5.0
> 
> This is not for production use.
> This release will change *dramatically* before the final release.

I really hope it won't.

I ks-installed both the x86 and x86_64 flavours. It just worked, and I 
haven't found any problems yet that would not be present in TUV's beta2 
as well.

> You have been warned.

Ok...

It's still good to have the familiar repository structure back. Thanks.
NB It seems CentOS made the same decision. I personally think both 
projects are right here.

Cheers,
	Stephan

-- 
Stephan Wiesand
  DESY - DV -
  Platanenallee 6
  15738 Zeuthen, Germany

ATOM RSS1 RSS2