SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

October 2013

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Brown, Chris (GE Healthcare)" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Brown, Chris (GE Healthcare)
Date:
Fri, 18 Oct 2013 20:05:47 +0000
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (2209 bytes) , text/html (8 kB)
It's ok Jonathan and I were just more curious, we missed that in the release notes.

The object now is just some good Friday humor for you ;-)
- Chris

From: Pat Riehecky [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2013 3:01 PM
To: Brown, Chris (GE Healthcare)
Cc: Schaaf, Jonathan P (GE Healthcare); [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL] SL 6.x enabled as repository in 6.4

Can I ask for a bit of info as to why you've got objections?

The yum-conf-sl6x package is included by the comps.xml, and not required by any packages.

This makes it easy to remove via yum and easy to disable in kickstart via '-yum-conf-sl6x'.

For HELiOS, it shouldn't get in the way.....

Pat

On 10/18/2013 02:44 PM, Brown, Chris (GE Healthcare) wrote:
I second that objection ;-) *grin*

From: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Schaaf, Jonathan P (GE Healthcare)
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2013 2:40 PM
To: Pat Riehecky
Cc: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
Subject: RE: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL] SL 6.x enabled as repository in 6.4

Can I object now? :-)

From: Pat Riehecky [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2013 2:37 PM
To: Schaaf, Jonathan P (GE Healthcare)
Cc: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL] SL 6.x enabled as repository in 6.4

On 10/18/2013 02:20 PM, Schaaf, Jonathan P (GE Healthcare) wrote:
I couldn't help but notice that yum-conf-sl6x-1.2 is installed as part of a default install of SL 6.4... is this a new "normal" or just something that was done accidentally while building 6.4?

Thanks,

Jonathan

Hi Jonathan,

When 6.4 was in beta there was a question about making '6x' enabled by default.  No one objected.  This change is noted in the Release Notes.

http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6.4/x86_64/os/sl-release-notes-6.4.html#DiffSL6

Pat



--

Pat Riehecky



Scientific Linux developer

http://www.scientificlinux.org/




--

Pat Riehecky



Scientific Linux developer

http://www.scientificlinux.org/


ATOM RSS1 RSS2