It's ok Jonathan and I were just more curious, we missed that in the release notes. The object now is just some good Friday humor for you ;-) - Chris From: Pat Riehecky [mailto:[log in to unmask]] Sent: Friday, October 18, 2013 3:01 PM To: Brown, Chris (GE Healthcare) Cc: Schaaf, Jonathan P (GE Healthcare); [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL] SL 6.x enabled as repository in 6.4 Can I ask for a bit of info as to why you've got objections? The yum-conf-sl6x package is included by the comps.xml, and not required by any packages. This makes it easy to remove via yum and easy to disable in kickstart via '-yum-conf-sl6x'. For HELiOS, it shouldn't get in the way..... Pat On 10/18/2013 02:44 PM, Brown, Chris (GE Healthcare) wrote: I second that objection ;-) *grin* From: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Schaaf, Jonathan P (GE Healthcare) Sent: Friday, October 18, 2013 2:40 PM To: Pat Riehecky Cc: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> Subject: RE: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL] SL 6.x enabled as repository in 6.4 Can I object now? :-) From: Pat Riehecky [mailto:[log in to unmask]] Sent: Friday, October 18, 2013 2:37 PM To: Schaaf, Jonathan P (GE Healthcare) Cc: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> Subject: Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL] SL 6.x enabled as repository in 6.4 On 10/18/2013 02:20 PM, Schaaf, Jonathan P (GE Healthcare) wrote: I couldn't help but notice that yum-conf-sl6x-1.2 is installed as part of a default install of SL 6.4... is this a new "normal" or just something that was done accidentally while building 6.4? Thanks, Jonathan Hi Jonathan, When 6.4 was in beta there was a question about making '6x' enabled by default. No one objected. This change is noted in the Release Notes. http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6.4/x86_64/os/sl-release-notes-6.4.html#DiffSL6 Pat -- Pat Riehecky Scientific Linux developer http://www.scientificlinux.org/ -- Pat Riehecky Scientific Linux developer http://www.scientificlinux.org/