LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

   

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives


June 2008


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

Certificate scientificlinux.org (2 messages)
Latest kernel-module-openafs update needs openafs >= 1.4.7 (2 messages)
RHEL support extended with one year (2 messages)
sata_nv device naming (1 message)
Scientific Linux "SL 5.2" Release Candidate 2 for i386 is now available for testing (6 messages)
Scientific Linux "SL 5.2" Release Candidate 2.5 for i386 and x86_64 (6 messages)
Scientific Linux "SL 5.2" Release Candidate 2.75 for i386 and x86_64 (3 messages)
Scientific Linux 5.2 Beta 2 on i386 and x86_64 (1 message)
Scientific Linux 5.2 Beta on i386 and x86_64 (10 messages)
Scientific Linux 5.2 i386 is officially released (5 messages)
Scientific Linux 5.2 RC 1 on i386 and x86_64 (1 message)
Scientific Linux 5.2 x86_64 is officially released (3 messages)
Security ERRATA for openoffice.org on SL5.x i386/x86_64 (2 messages)
SL 5.2 libcxgb3-devel old version? (3 messages)
SL5.2RC / Eclipse (2 messages)
umask issue with SL_rpm_show_arch scripts (4 messages)
What to update for SL 5.2 (14 messages)
When will SL 5.2. alpha release be out? (11 messages)
www.scientificlinux.org uses an invalid security certificate (5 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Home

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

Certificate scientificlinux.org

Certificate scientificlinux.org

Patrick Moelands

Thu, 19 Jun 2008 08:06:50 +0200

18 lines

Re: Certificate scientificlinux.org

Troy Dawson

Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:49:18 -0500

29 lines

New Thread

Latest kernel-module-openafs update needs openafs >= 1.4.7

Latest kernel-module-openafs update needs openafs >= 1.4.7

Glenn Morris

Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:53:23 -0700

16 lines

Re: Latest kernel-module-openafs update needs openafs >= 1.4.7

Troy Dawson

Thu, 26 Jun 2008 10:12:07 -0500

29 lines

New Thread

RHEL support extended with one year

RHEL support extended with one year

Patrick Moelands

Fri, 20 Jun 2008 08:07:55 +0200

22 lines

RHEL support extended with one year

R P Herrold

Fri, 20 Jun 2008 10:09:14 -0400

28 lines

New Thread

sata_nv device naming

sata_nv device naming

Andrew Elwell

Sun, 1 Jun 2008 08:56:15 +0100

66 lines

New Thread

Scientific Linux "SL 5.2" Release Candidate 2 for i386 is now available for testing

Scientific Linux "SL 5.2" Release Candidate 2 for i386 is now available for testing

Connie Sieh

Tue, 17 Jun 2008 17:34:08 -0500

125 lines

Re: Scientific Linux "SL 5.2" Release Candidate 2 for i386 is now available for testing

Christian Rüger

Wed, 18 Jun 2008 19:40:18 +0200

27 lines

Re: Scientific Linux "SL 5.2" Release Candidate 2 for i386 is now available for testing

Troy Dawson

Wed, 18 Jun 2008 15:33:43 -0500

39 lines

Re: Scientific Linux "SL 5.2" Release Candidate 2 for i386 is now available for testing

Jon Peatfield

Thu, 19 Jun 2008 02:17:12 +0100

30 lines

Re: Scientific Linux "SL 5.2" Release Candidate 2 for i386 is now available for testing

Troy Dawson

Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:54:50 -0500

48 lines

Re: Scientific Linux "SL 5.2" Release Candidate 2 for i386 is now available for testing

Stephan Wiesand

Sat, 21 Jun 2008 16:46:43 +0200

41 lines

New Thread

Scientific Linux "SL 5.2" Release Candidate 2.5 for i386 and x86_64

Scientific Linux "SL 5.2" Release Candidate 2.5 for i386 and x86_64

Troy Dawson

Tue, 24 Jun 2008 17:52:07 -0500

126 lines

Re: Scientific Linux "SL 5.2" Release Candidate 2.5 for i386 and x86_64

Dr Andrew C Aitchison

Wed, 25 Jun 2008 11:25:21 +0100

59 lines

Re: Scientific Linux "SL 5.2" Release Candidate 2.5 for i386 and x86_64

Troy Dawson

Wed, 25 Jun 2008 09:22:14 -0500

76 lines

Re: Scientific Linux "SL 5.2" Release Candidate 2.5 for i386 and x86_64

Jon Peatfield

Wed, 25 Jun 2008 19:04:51 +0100

40 lines

Re: Scientific Linux "SL 5.2" Release Candidate 2.5 for i386 and x86_64

Patrick Moelands

Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:40:30 +0200

24 lines

Re: Scientific Linux "SL 5.2" Release Candidate 2.5 for i386 and x86_64

Troy Dawson

Wed, 25 Jun 2008 14:44:28 -0500

37 lines

New Thread

Scientific Linux "SL 5.2" Release Candidate 2.75 for i386 and x86_64

Scientific Linux "SL 5.2" Release Candidate 2.75 for i386 and x86_64

Troy Dawson

Wed, 25 Jun 2008 16:54:52 -0500

138 lines

Re: Scientific Linux "SL 5.2" Release Candidate 2.75 for i386 and x86_64

Jan Iven

Thu, 26 Jun 2008 11:40:13 +0200

34 lines

Re: Scientific Linux "SL 5.2" Release Candidate 2.75 for i386 and x86_64

Troy Dawson

Thu, 26 Jun 2008 10:12:39 -0500

45 lines

New Thread

Scientific Linux 5.2 Beta 2 on i386 and x86_64

Scientific Linux 5.2 Beta 2 on i386 and x86_64

Troy Dawson

Tue, 10 Jun 2008 15:47:52 -0500

75 lines

New Thread

Scientific Linux 5.2 Beta on i386 and x86_64

Scientific Linux 5.2 Beta on i386 and x86_64

Troy Dawson

Fri, 6 Jun 2008 16:38:58 -0500

159 lines

Re: Scientific Linux 5.2 Beta on i386 and x86_64

Patrick Moelands

Sat, 7 Jun 2008 15:28:06 +0200

39 lines

Re: Scientific Linux 5.2 Beta on i386 and x86_64

Troy Dawson

Mon, 9 Jun 2008 09:16:16 -0500

63 lines

Re: Scientific Linux 5.2 Beta on i386 and x86_64

Patrick Moelands

Mon, 9 Jun 2008 17:06:45 +0200

39 lines

Re: Scientific Linux 5.2 Beta on i386 and x86_64

Troy Dawson

Mon, 9 Jun 2008 10:22:09 -0500

35 lines

Re: Scientific Linux 5.2 Beta on i386 and x86_64

Patrick Moelands

Tue, 10 Jun 2008 08:03:22 +0200

24 lines

Re: Scientific Linux 5.2 Beta on i386 and x86_64

Connie Sieh

Tue, 10 Jun 2008 10:09:44 -0500

30 lines

Re: Scientific Linux 5.2 Beta on i386 and x86_64

Troy Dawson

Tue, 10 Jun 2008 10:17:34 -0500

36 lines

Re: Scientific Linux 5.2 Beta on i386 and x86_64

Patrick Moelands

Sun, 15 Jun 2008 10:25:24 +0200

38 lines

Re: Scientific Linux 5.2 Beta on i386 and x86_64

Patrick Moelands

Sun, 15 Jun 2008 10:29:35 +0200

29 lines

New Thread

Scientific Linux 5.2 i386 is officially released

Scientific Linux 5.2 i386 is officially released

Troy Dawson

Fri, 27 Jun 2008 10:18:37 -0500

2453 lines

Re: Scientific Linux 5.2 i386 is officially released

Timmy

Sat, 28 Jun 2008 01:00:59 +0800

6628 lines

Re: Scientific Linux 5.2 i386 is officially released

Timmy

Sat, 28 Jun 2008 01:02:54 +0800

14 lines

Re: Scientific Linux 5.2 i386 is officially released

Troy Dawson

Fri, 27 Jun 2008 12:13:44 -0500

37 lines

Re: Scientific Linux 5.2 i386 is officially released

Timmy

Sat, 28 Jun 2008 17:39:34 +0800

35 lines

New Thread

Scientific Linux 5.2 RC 1 on i386 and x86_64

Scientific Linux 5.2 RC 1 on i386 and x86_64

Troy Dawson

Thu, 12 Jun 2008 16:45:07 -0500

167 lines

New Thread

Scientific Linux 5.2 x86_64 is officially released

Scientific Linux 5.2 x86_64 is officially released

Troy Dawson

Fri, 27 Jun 2008 10:21:45 -0500

2463 lines

Re: Scientific Linux 5.2 x86_64 is officially released

Andrew Elwell

Fri, 27 Jun 2008 22:59:55 +0100

20 lines

Re: Scientific Linux 5.2 x86_64 is officially released

Kresnik Igor

Sun, 29 Jun 2008 10:57:27 +0200

28 lines

New Thread

Security ERRATA for openoffice.org on SL5.x i386/x86_64

Re: Security ERRATA for openoffice.org on SL5.x i386/x86_64

Alex Kruchkoff

Wed, 18 Jun 2008 10:39:30 +1000

194 lines

Re: Security ERRATA for openoffice.org on SL5.x i386/x86_64

Troy Dawson

Wed, 18 Jun 2008 15:32:04 -0500

213 lines

New Thread

SL 5.2 libcxgb3-devel old version?

SL 5.2 libcxgb3-devel old version?

Kenneth MacDonald

Thu, 26 Jun 2008 17:05:06 +0100

30 lines

Re: SL 5.2 libcxgb3-devel old version?

Ralph Angenendt

Fri, 27 Jun 2008 16:22:54 +0200

56 lines

Re: SL 5.2 libcxgb3-devel old version?

Connie Sieh

Fri, 27 Jun 2008 09:42:15 -0500

43 lines

New Thread

SL5.2RC / Eclipse

SL5.2RC / Eclipse

Patrick Moelands

Mon, 23 Jun 2008 12:18:13 +0200

27 lines

Re: SL5.2RC / Eclipse

Troy Dawson

Mon, 23 Jun 2008 08:39:34 -0500

38 lines

New Thread

umask issue with SL_rpm_show_arch scripts

umask issue with SL_rpm_show_arch scripts

Dr Andrew C Aitchison

Fri, 13 Jun 2008 16:48:59 +0100

49 lines

Re: umask issue with SL_rpm_show_arch scripts

Troy Dawson

Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:05:56 -0500

47 lines

Re: umask issue with SL_rpm_show_arch scripts

Dr Andrew C Aitchison

Fri, 13 Jun 2008 17:13:22 +0100

75 lines

Re: umask issue with SL_rpm_show_arch scripts

Troy Dawson

Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:23:32 -0500

42 lines

New Thread

What to update for SL 5.2

What to update for SL 5.2

Troy Dawson

Tue, 3 Jun 2008 16:39:03 -0500

75 lines

Re: What to update for SL 5.2

Jon Peatfield

Wed, 4 Jun 2008 17:39:38 +0100

58 lines

Re: What to update for SL 5.2

Ralph Angenendt

Wed, 4 Jun 2008 22:56:29 +0200

42 lines

Re: What to update for SL 5.2

Jon Peatfield

Thu, 5 Jun 2008 05:41:50 +0100

56 lines

Re: What to update for SL 5.2

Stephan Wiesand

Thu, 5 Jun 2008 08:47:46 +0200

91 lines

Re: What to update for SL 5.2

Urs Beyerle

Thu, 5 Jun 2008 21:43:32 +0200

35 lines

Re: What to update for SL 5.2

Troy Dawson

Thu, 5 Jun 2008 15:11:28 -0500

42 lines

Re: What to update for SL 5.2

Urs Beyerle

Thu, 5 Jun 2008 22:35:11 +0200

45 lines

Re: What to update for SL 5.2

Urs Beyerle

Thu, 5 Jun 2008 22:39:49 +0200

51 lines

Re: What to update for SL 5.2

Troy Dawson

Thu, 5 Jun 2008 15:50:51 -0500

56 lines

Re: What to update for SL 5.2

Urs Beyerle

Thu, 5 Jun 2008 23:18:22 +0200

77 lines

Re: What to update for SL 5.2

Troy Dawson

Fri, 6 Jun 2008 09:05:03 -0500

92 lines

Re: What to update for SL 5.2

Urs Beyerle

Fri, 6 Jun 2008 16:32:55 +0200

109 lines

What to update for SL 5.2

Patrick Moelands

Tue, 17 Jun 2008 00:11:20 +0200

21 lines

New Thread

When will SL 5.2. alpha release be out?

Re: When will SL 5.2. alpha release be out?

Connie Sieh

Tue, 3 Jun 2008 10:46:10 -0500

47 lines

Re: When will SL 5.2. alpha release be out?

Stephan Wiesand

Tue, 3 Jun 2008 18:11:42 +0200

65 lines

Re: When will SL 5.2. alpha release be out?

Troy Dawson

Tue, 3 Jun 2008 16:44:15 -0500

80 lines

Re: When will SL 5.2. alpha release be out?

Troy Dawson

Tue, 3 Jun 2008 17:08:44 -0500

130 lines

Re: When will SL 5.2. alpha release be out?

Urs Beyerle

Fri, 6 Jun 2008 10:20:15 +0200

31 lines

Re: When will SL 5.2. alpha release be out?

Troy Dawson

Fri, 6 Jun 2008 08:58:54 -0500

43 lines

Re: When will SL 5.2. alpha release be out?

Patrick Moelands

Fri, 6 Jun 2008 16:48:44 +0200

22 lines

Re: When will SL 5.2. alpha release be out?

Troy Dawson

Fri, 6 Jun 2008 09:53:12 -0500

35 lines

Re: When will SL 5.2. alpha release be out?

Urs Beyerle

Fri, 6 Jun 2008 17:22:17 +0200

33 lines

Re: When will SL 5.2. alpha release be out?

Patrick Moelands

Fri, 6 Jun 2008 20:39:53 +0200

30 lines

Re: When will SL 5.2. alpha release be out?

Patrick Moelands

Sat, 7 Jun 2008 00:39:11 +0200

27 lines

New Thread

www.scientificlinux.org uses an invalid security certificate

www.scientificlinux.org uses an invalid security certificate

Urs Beyerle

Mon, 9 Jun 2008 10:55:15 +0200

34 lines

Re: www.scientificlinux.org uses an invalid security certificate

Patrick Moelands

Mon, 9 Jun 2008 11:19:39 +0200

24 lines

Re: www.scientificlinux.org uses an invalid security certificate

Dr Andrew C Aitchison

Mon, 9 Jun 2008 10:32:14 +0100

36 lines

Re: www.scientificlinux.org uses an invalid security certificate

Steven Timm

Mon, 9 Jun 2008 08:53:11 -0500

41 lines

Re: www.scientificlinux.org uses an invalid security certificate

Marc W. Mengel

Mon, 9 Jun 2008 09:45:18 -0500

24 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

July 2022
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
May 2020
April 2020
February 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager