Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 4 Feb 2021 01:03:03 +0000 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I will not move to Debian.
RHEL clones have 10 years of lifecycle, AlmaLinux just dropped it’s beta today. So there’s no reason to move to Debian or Ubuntu.
> On 3 Feb 2021, at 21:52, Keith Lofstrom <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> Having been burned by IBM before, and with no guarantee
> that "Long-term Redhat for individuals" will survive IBM's
> legal department into the far future --- I'm thinking about
> abandoning 25 years of Redhat experience and switching to
> Debian, while my aging brain can still handle change.
>
> Debian - yikes!
>
> Thinking about - not decided, though I halted work on a
> server upgrade to CentOS 8 while I wait for the dust to
> settle. Rocky in April is another option, but if IBM
> goes after them, they will be a wet spot on the floor.
>
> So - who else is contemplating a move to Debian?
>
> I very much hope to stay connected to the "scientific"
> aspect of our community. Making big changes together
> with other science computationalists would be easier.
>
> Easier still would be staying with an RPM distro, IF it
> remained useful and legal and affordable for our kind of
> computing. An e-commerce and corporate infrastructure
> focused distro, not so much.
>
> Keith
>
> P.S. I remember the Red Hat booth at OSCON 2014, after the
> Borging of CentOS, where I was assured that they would
> support CentOS into the distant future. That "assurance"
> survived the IBM acquisition by 18 months. What changes
> will 5 more years of IBM (and their formidable lega
> department, called the Nazgul by other technology lawyers)
> result in?
>
>
> --
> Keith Lofstrom [log in to unmask]
|
|
|