SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

April 2017

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Date:
Tue, 11 Apr 2017 08:20:49 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 1:23 PM, David Sommerseth
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On 10/04/17 09:15, Tom H wrote:
>>
>> zfs'll never be in-tree for licensing reasons.
>
> Well, "never" might be a too strong word. Stranger things have
> happened, like Microsoft embracing Linux and open source; even
> starting to open up some of their closed projects as open source ;-)
>
> But I'll give you that Oracle is probably a very different beast on
> the legal side and doesn't have a too good "open source karma".

No one can see Oracle changing the zfs license to one that's
gpl-compatible. The cddl is supposed to be gpl-incompatible by design.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2