SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

April 2017

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailing list for Scientific Linux users worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 11 Apr 2017 08:20:49 -0400
Reply-To:
Tom H <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: RAID 6 array and failing harddrives
From:
Tom H <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
Comments:
To: SL Users <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines) 
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 1:23 PM, David Sommerseth
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On 10/04/17 09:15, Tom H wrote:
>>
>> zfs'll never be in-tree for licensing reasons.
>
> Well, "never" might be a too strong word. Stranger things have
> happened, like Microsoft embracing Linux and open source; even
> starting to open up some of their closed projects as open source ;-)
>
> But I'll give you that Oracle is probably a very different beast on
> the legal side and doesn't have a too good "open source karma".

No one can see Oracle changing the zfs license to one that's
gpl-compatible. The cddl is supposed to be gpl-incompatible by design.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2