SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

December 2016

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"aleksander.baranowski" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
aleksander.baranowski
Date:
Wed, 28 Dec 2016 11:35:41 +0100
Content-Type:
multipart/signed
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1031 bytes) , signature.asc (763 bytes)
Hi,
Sorry for spamming and
Sorry for writing
"I saved our scripts"
instead of
"I saved your scripts"

Bests,
Alex

PS. Yours would be probably even better :).

On 12/28/2016 11:29 AM, aleksander.baranowski wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Sorry for such late answer, but I tried to figured it out on my own (I
> hate to admit it but I failed :(.). I prefer revisor/pungi way of making
> iso because, it allow me to make iso from "bare" repo, and it fitted
> perfectly my pipelines. But because time is short and making not working
> isos is time consuming I assumed, that change SL5.11 iso might be better
> way.
> 
> After a few tries My iso get SIGSEGV after checking(first test in
> installation process) ISO, or bad context for repodata without checking it.
> 
> Mark - I would appreciate any help, working script especially :), it
> might save me a few days of searching/reading/scripting.
> 
> Oleg - Thanks for your help, I saved our scripts, and in case of further
> failures I will make it your sane way, i.e. making iso from scratch.
> 
> All Best,
> Alex




ATOM RSS1 RSS2