Sender: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 28 Dec 2016 11:35:41 +0100 |
Reply-To: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Type: |
multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
boundary="kD9WaX5K1NbsmuPOk2BBxfMXIUouLEntP" |
In-Reply-To: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Comments: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi,
Sorry for spamming and
Sorry for writing
"I saved our scripts"
instead of
"I saved your scripts"
Bests,
Alex
PS. Yours would be probably even better :).
On 12/28/2016 11:29 AM, aleksander.baranowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry for such late answer, but I tried to figured it out on my own (I
> hate to admit it but I failed :(.). I prefer revisor/pungi way of making
> iso because, it allow me to make iso from "bare" repo, and it fitted
> perfectly my pipelines. But because time is short and making not working
> isos is time consuming I assumed, that change SL5.11 iso might be better
> way.
>
> After a few tries My iso get SIGSEGV after checking(first test in
> installation process) ISO, or bad context for repodata without checking it.
>
> Mark - I would appreciate any help, working script especially :), it
> might save me a few days of searching/reading/scripting.
>
> Oleg - Thanks for your help, I saved our scripts, and in case of further
> failures I will make it your sane way, i.e. making iso from scratch.
>
> All Best,
> Alex
|
|
|